<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>the mergy notes &#187; CentOS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mergy.org/category/centos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mergy.org</link>
	<description>hopefully some useful information, hacks, and solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:43:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Symantec BackupExec 2010, RALUS and Centos 5 Works</title>
		<link>http://mergy.org/2010/04/symantec-backupexec-2010-ralus-and-centos-5-works/</link>
		<comments>http://mergy.org/2010/04/symantec-backupexec-2010-ralus-and-centos-5-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mergy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CentOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SysAdmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backing up Centos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backup Exec 2010 and Centos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backup Exec 2010 and RALUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BackupExec and RALUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BackupExec RALUS and CentOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPv6 and Backup Exec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RALUS and CentOS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mergy.org/?p=513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whew, what a pain this has been. Always had a heck of a time with BackupExec 12.5 and below backing up CentOS versions. I think early versions of RALUS were operational and worked back in the BackupExec 8-10.5 days prior to Symantec's acquistion of Veritas. But, it has never been really easy to get this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mergy.org/2010/04/symantec-backupexec-2010-ralus-and-centos-5-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Complex GUI IPTables Setup for CentOS 5.x with Bastille Linux</title>
		<link>http://mergy.org/2010/03/complex-iptables-setup-for-centos-5-x-with-bastille-linux/</link>
		<comments>http://mergy.org/2010/03/complex-iptables-setup-for-centos-5-x-with-bastille-linux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mergy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CentOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SysAdmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bastille Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complex firewall setup linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPTables on CentOS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mergy.org/?p=465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have a few CentOS boxes and require a little more IPTables tweaking than the standard security setup in the GUI. I could go into the IPTables config files, but I am more than a little rusty on the logic for IPTables. So, I went back to an old stand-by to config the multiple interfaces [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mergy.org/2010/03/complex-iptables-setup-for-centos-5-x-with-bastille-linux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Problems with Lacie iamakey USB Flash Drives fixed</title>
		<link>http://mergy.org/2010/01/problems-with-lacie-iamakey-usb-flash-drives-fixed/</link>
		<comments>http://mergy.org/2010/01/problems-with-lacie-iamakey-usb-flash-drives-fixed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mergy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CentOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SysAdmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[format lacie iamakey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iamakey format]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lacie iamakey problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partition issues with iamakey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mergy.org/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really like the design of the Lacie iamakey and related USB flash memory sticks that look like actual keys. I was thinking about moving off the consistent performers I issue to employees, faculty and staff from Sandisk. So, I got an 8 gig and 32 gig to test over the last couple of months. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mergy.org/2010/01/problems-with-lacie-iamakey-usb-flash-drives-fixed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denyhosts is your friend to stop ssh login attempts</title>
		<link>http://mergy.org/2008/05/denyhosts-is-your-friend-to-stop-ssh-login-attempts/</link>
		<comments>http://mergy.org/2008/05/denyhosts-is-your-friend-to-stop-ssh-login-attempts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 17:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mergy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CentOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial of service ssh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logwatch sshd failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssh Authentication Failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssh login attempts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sshd Authentication Failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop ssh attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop ssh login attempts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mergy.org/2008/05/23/denyhosts-is-your-friend-to-stop-ssh-login-attempts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have a few linux servers that for whatever reason you have to leave open to ssh into on the standard port 22, denyhosts is a great way to get rid of the annoying daily logwatch email logs showing some losers somewhere have been spending all day doing a denial of service trying to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mergy.org/2008/05/denyhosts-is-your-friend-to-stop-ssh-login-attempts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
